Skip to content

Posts from the ‘case interview’ Category

The Hazards of a CEO who Loves Consultants

One of the great myths among aspiring consultants, is that strategy consultants go in and basically take over and run the entire strategy and direction of a company. That does happen at times, but is more the exception than the norm. In fact, there are dangers to this outsourcing of thinking. Yet, the danger is not the outsourcing itself, but rather who is doing the outsourcing: a strong and accountable CEO or a weak CEO.

The greatest risk to a company is a weak CEO who outsources accountability to consultants. In this podcast, I discuss my own personal experiencing of advising such a CEO and the chaos which ensued.

Why brilliance in structuring frameworks only helps with 40% of McKinsey cases

At least 90% of aspiring management consultants assume that all McKinsey et al cases MUST be solved with frameworks. That is a dangerous myth. At least 60% of all McKinsey full cases (we are not referring to brainstorming, estimates etc) cannot be solved with structures and you will fail if you used structures to solve them. In this podcast, we use the experiences of a client, Felix, to explain how to identify this second group of cases and what you can do to solve them.

A Harvard Baker Scholar and McKinsey Principal provide compelling lessons in perseverance

This podcast describes the journeys of two people and where they ended up in life.

The first is one of Harvard’s most distinguished MBA graduates ever who was not even invited to a McKinsey internship interview.

The second is a McKinsey Principal from humble beginnings who is rejected the partnership, not once, but twice.

Who they are and what they eventually achieve professionally is a lesson in perseverance, confidence and being analytic.

Building a McKinsey-Killer within a Major IT/Outsourcing Firm

In early 2013, we were invited by the chairman of a major IT/Outsourcing provider to analyze their business and determine why their significant acquisitions of strategy/operations/general consulting skills had not created a “McKinsey-Killer”.

The chairman believed that their IT skills and consulting abilities should have blended together to create a very strong competitor in the market – which should have toppled McKinsey BTO. Despite some big wins in the early days, the consulting team has been marginalized over the last 5 years and currently contributes <4% of revenue, <1% of profit and no consulting director sits on the operating committees, board, management committees or business division councils.

Our findings, shared in this podcast, present important lessons for any IT, engineering or audit firm trying to “bolt-on” their existing technical skills to create a consulting firm which is unique and useful to clients.

Join us at the Ritz Carlton Buckhead Atlanta, Georgia between 29 September 2013 and 2 October 2013

Firmsconsulting will be hosting a series of events for MBA and PhD students/graduates over the final few days of September. If you would like to meet us for breakfast, or dinner please email a copy of your résumé to firmsconsulting@gmail.com. A cover letter is not necessary and any résumé format will be accepted. Some of our most eminent mentors, including Kevin Coyne (the former McKinsey Worldwide Strategy Co-Leader) and the former Bain worldwide strategy leader will be in attendance.

Selection will be entirely merit based and we look forward to meeting many talented MBA and PhD students. This event is open to clients and non-clients of Firmsconsulting.

Applications should be addressed to Michael Boricki.

Why billable hours are a bad idea…

Although this was written for the legal industry, it explains why elite consulting firms should not, and do not, follow a billable hour model.

Reproduced in its entirety from the New York Times.

The Tyranny of the Billable Hour

By STEVEN J. HARPER

“THAT bill shall know no limits,” wrote one DLA Piper lawyer to another in 2010 in what the firm is now calling “unfortunate banter” between associates about work for a client. But what is truly unfortunate is the underlying billable-hour regime and the law-firm culture it has spawned. Read more

Why Firmsconsulting has been quiet recently

This is a short post to wish everyone a Merry Xmas and prosperous New Year, and explain the relative silence on our website.

Over the last year we have recently lots of feedback/ideas/strategies from clients and readers about changes Firmsconsulting should make. Some of you went out of your way to even offer strategy analyses which was of a very high quality.  I keep two of these documents with me at all times since the ideas have forced us to review how we engage our clients. One is a Yale PhD and the other is a PhD in Computer Science. Most of the recommendations were very insightful and has made us think about what we do and why we do it.

“Is this the best way to train clients for case interviews and prepare them to be future consulting leaders?”

We will not ever stray from our heavy focus on values, only using ex-MBB partners and high quality content. Yet, while we discuss the changes we thought it best to continue producing unique content but holding it offline.

Detailed Statistical Analysis of Client Profiles

Our placement rate for the Sep/Oct 2012 recruiting period was 68.3% ~ 68%. This number only includes candidates pursuing McKinsey, BCG & Bain. If we include firms like Roland Berger, Oliver Wyman, Booz, AT Kearney etc, the number moves up to 71.6% ~ 72%.

This post is a detailed analysis of this placement rate. Clients who worked with us know we ask for a lot of information throughout the interaction. We ask that every interaction be shared with us, and preferably a copy of any networking emails sent, be mailed to us as well. Basically, we want to know as much as the candidate. Read more

Does McKinsey intentionally invite many interviewees to market itself?

“There is an opinion that McKinsey’s interviewing approach is very different from BCG’s and Bain’s in the following respect: for the same number of final offers McKinsey interviews much more people than the last two companies. This means that it is easier to get interview invitation from McKinsey than from BCG or Bain, but the odds of getting a final offer after you go through interview process are lower. There is an opinion that McKinsey intentionally invites too many people to interviews as a sort of marketing itself to potential future clients. Do you think it is true?

I ask this question because I have been invited by McKinsey to the second round after a remarkably weak performance during the first round. I simply cannot understand why I was invited. The only explanation I can come up with is that they have a target number of people whom they want to interview in the second round, and they are going to interview this number regardless of the quality of people. Read more

Firmsconsulting Mentors

We founded Firmsconsulting on the belief that ex-principals of the top-three strategy firms would be best equipped at placing clients into McKinsey, Bain, BCG & Roland Berger. Simply put, we believe clients should be coached by the very people who made the final decision on hiring.

There are substantial insights that only partners have and our clients should have this competitive advantage.

We are going to extend our principal-only core philosophy by working with four of the most eminent former McKinsey directors and BCG senior partners who will now provide mentorship to clients excelling in our case coaching program and demonstrating strong potential for growth.

The Mentors

All mentors were former-senior partners/directors of only McKinsey, BCG or Bain, and former co-leaders/leaders of their respective global practices. We could not find more eminent leaders in the consulting field. Three mentors currently serve as executive officers of Fortune 500 companies, including a bank.

Each mentor specializes in one of four functions: strategy, corporate finance, business technology or operations. All have broad domain expertise across multiple sectors. Our mentors have both US and non-US experiences – Latin America, Asia and Europe – to help clients pursuing consulting careers outside the US.

For confidentiality reasons, biographies of mentors who are current executive officers of listed companies will not be made public. However, full resumes of the assigned mentor will be available to our clients, whom would have signed our extensive NDA agreement – a standard requirement to work with us.

  • Kevin is the former McKinsey & Co. worldwide strategy practice co-leader and CEO transitions practice co-leader. Kevin’s biography and interview for Firmsconsulting may be viewed here, and an extensive Firmsconsulting Quarterly cover story piece about Kevin’s leadership style is presented here.
  • The former regional financial institutions group practice co-leader who is an executive officer of a listed Fortune 500 company and served as a senior executive of a bulge-bracket investment bank after leaving management consulting.
  • The former regional business technology practice co-leader and special-counsel to the CEO of a listed US Fortune 500 company.
  • The former senior partner and regional operations practice leader and an executive officer of a listed Fortune 500 company.

We may use different mentors from those listed above when this is required to augment a client’s specific goals. For example, in Japan we are working with a media executive over 3 weeks to position him as an experienced-hire and will thereafter pair him with a former McKinsey director, head of an Asian hub-office and practice leader to round out his leadership profile.

All interaction with mentors, as with coaches, is bound by our NDA agreements and should be treated as confidential at all times. We value discretion.

Logistics

Mentors may only be assigned after a client receives their case training program mid-point feedback at session 6. This will allow clients approximately six sessions to incorporate feedback from their coach and mentor while possessing sufficient basic consulting skills to benefit from the mentoring. After session 6, selected clients will have two ex-partners guiding them – a mentor and a coach.

Discussions with mentors should focus on career planning and positioning. We believe that the case training provided by a client’s coach is best complemented by the career planning provided by the mentor.

Clients began receiving invites into the mentorship program since 20 October 2012 and will continue receiving invites on a rolling basis. There is no deadline and all clients of Firmsconsulting are automatically eligible.

We advise clients to only proceed with follow-up mentoring sessions when they are prepared. Your mentor and coach will decide if/when it would be the appropriate time to have the next session.

Please note that, rescheduling mentoring meetings will not be permitted once a date and time are mutually agreed with your mentor.

Clients who are appointed a mentor and reside in Atlanta, Boston, Seoul or London may, pending mutual availability, meet their mentor.

Guidelines for Selecting Clients into the Mentorship Program

All clients in our program are treated equal. We have a thorough screening process to find, invite and groom tomorrow’s consulting leaders. You are in the program because you have passed our rigorous screening process – which has a 15% acceptance rate – and have the attributes required to succeed in management consulting, irrespective of your background or perceived weaknesses.

Therefore, your educational background, ranking of your school, GMAT scores and GPA or resume strength will not influence your chances of being selected for mentoring once you have joined the program.

Case performance in the first six sessions, potential displayed in the coaching sessions and adherence to our value system will be the three sole criteria used.

Clients can improve their chances of being awarded a mentor by doing the following.

First, prepare well and perform well in the case coaching sessions. If you subscribe to the video libraries it is imperative you use them to come adequately prepared. It is not enough to merely watch them, you have to understand them and apply the underlying principles. Listen carefully to feedback, take notes and use these notes. Ensure you are available to be contacted by your coach on Skype, arrive on time and ensure your equipment is tested before the session. The administrative details matter.

Second, potential is measured in three ways. We initially look at your ability to extract the lessons from the videos, and use them in your lessons. We thereafter look at how much of the feedback we provide in the session is captured, and how much of it is used appropriately either immediately after the feedback is provided, or in the next session. For example, consistently repeating a mistake lowers your chances of being selected. Finally, communication is vital. You need to constantly demonstrate your intellect by holding a meaningful discussion with your coach.

Third, but certainly not the last, is adherence to our value system. We select only the best candidates and groom future consulting leaders. We expect candidates to be ethical, respectful and professional at all times, be it in their interactions with us or decisions they make during the course of the program.

That said, upon selection to this competitive program, clients should make the adequate preparation to engage their mentors. Researching mentors, having a clear agenda and confidence in one’s abilities will go a long way towards creating a strong impression, and developing a mutually-beneficial relationship. The best mentors are those who take a personal interest in a client’s development, and mentors will do so if the client comes prepared. Listen to our podcast on “Influencing the interviewer” to understand how to build a compelling profile to sustain the relationship.

***

Talented future consulting leaders do not always graduate from Ivy League schools, hang out in Harvard Business Review chat-groups or read Bloomberg. We hold the rare distinction of placing the first McKinsey and BCG hires from several countries in Africa, the Middle East and South-East-Asia.

We are proud of that record and understand the significance of the role we play in nurturing talented individuals and providing opportunities they may not have easily had by themselves.

We want to find such people who have the intellect to succeed in management consulting, but not the easiest path to get there. A good example of such a candidate was a young lady from a tiny, war wracked country in Greater Asia who once wrote to us and asked for help. She clearly did not expect a positive reply and we took some time in responding as we assessed her profile. She did not fit the image of a typical consultant and the firms did not have even have an office in her home country. She had no relationships into management consulting, came from a very poor background and barely had a working laptop to be coached.

Those were some difficult coaching sessions as her laptop regularly overheated, the Skype connection dropped repeatedly and we were unable to share screens. In fact, she borrowed money for her interview preparation and travelling expenses.

Yet, she secured an offer at McKinsey; the first person from her country to do so.

We are always looking for such outstanding hidden talent, and both coaches and mentors will work to ensure worthy clients have as many advantages as possible going into the interview.

Clients in all our programs may be paired with mentors. Aspiring consultants, as described above, will make up the majority of mentees. However, current consultants at McKinsey, BCG and Bain are also a part of this program and will comprise a substantial percentage of all mentees.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 940 other followers

%d bloggers like this: